On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Dancer wrote:
> Will try it when I get into the office (about 15 mins). Did I give you
> the results of that last trial? With uncacheable objects the system
> performed about 30 req/sec faster than its best using
> rep_cachable:80/dhr:55.
Yes, I've already commented that the difference is much smaller than I
would expect.
> Yet physical disk I/O was about the same during
> each (virtually nil)
Hmm.. There should be no disk traffic with uncachable replies and
half-empty disks (no garbage collection). There should be a lot of disk
traffic during polymix#1 runs.
Alex.
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:57 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:06 MST