On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> I regard it as more of a problem to have such a inflexible and separate
> access control to cachemgr as the current one is.
Does anybody need a more flexible and integrated control? :)
> What about this comromise:
>
> acl aclname manager <cachemgr_passwd actions, or ANY>
> acl aclname password user:password ...,
> wildcard (*) user allowed if only the correct password is required.
>
> and that "manager shutdown" and "manager config" needs to be defined to
> be allowed at all (like "method PURGE").
Sounds OK to me as long as it does not require a mandatory external process
to authenticate.
Alex.
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:54 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:56 MST