Henrik Nordstrom writes:
>Duane Wessels wrote:
>
>> A simple solution hasn't presented itself to me yet.
>
>What about doing a expunge each time we get a uncacheable object? Or
>more precicely: Each time we have retreived a complete object, expunge
>any old version regardless if the new one is cacheable or not.
You mean if the new, uncachable reply is status code 200 only?
Duane W.
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:51 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:51 MST