Hi,
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> PUT requests are of course NOT cacheable (and this is very clear in the
> HTTP spec). What I refered to is how to handle a cached object with the
> same URI (URL). This object should be considered stale after a PUT
> request, but is that regardless of the success or failure of the PUT
> request?
Now I understand! Is it possible that the PUT partially succeeded,
invalidating the cache since the object on the target server changed?
Regards,
-- miguel a.l. paraz <map@iphil.net> +63-2-893-0850 iphil communications, makati city, philippines <http://www.iphil.net>Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:40 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:14 MST