Re: MOO Meeting 970305

From: Miguel A.L. Paraz <map@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 17:33:39 +0800 (HKT)

Hi,

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
 
> PUT requests are of course NOT cacheable (and this is very clear in the
> HTTP spec). What I refered to is how to handle a cached object with the
> same URI (URL). This object should be considered stale after a PUT
> request, but is that regardless of the success or failure of the PUT
> request?

Now I understand! Is it possible that the PUT partially succeeded,
invalidating the cache since the object on the target server changed?

Regards,

-- 
miguel a.l. paraz  <map@iphil.net>                              +63-2-893-0850
iphil communications, makati city, philippines          <http://www.iphil.net> 
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:40 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:14 MST